Category: BC Catholic

This is the third part in a series about Church-provided health care in Canada to mark National Catholic Health Care Week, Feb. 1–7.

Catholic health care has long been part of Canada’s publicly funded health-care system, caring for patients of every faith and background in a moral tradition that places human dignity at the centre of care.

That dual role has always required careful navigation. Catholic institutions and professionals work within the public system while trying to honour conscience, professional responsibility, and the common good at the same time.

In Catholic facilities, decisions are shaped by principles that stress respect for life, care for the vulnerable, and moral responsibility in professional practice. For clinicians, nurses, and support staff, conscience is not an abstract idea. It is part of daily work, influencing how they walk with patients and families through illness, suffering, and death.

In B.C., those ethical tensions have sometimes been felt sharply. A case now before the B.C. Supreme Court is examining whether faith-based hospitals can be required to provide euthanasia on-site.

In recent years, The B.C. Catholic obtained documents from the Fraser Health Authority showing that assisted-dying policies created “ethical dilemmas” for some clinical staff, with at least one senior palliative-care physician choosing to resign rather than take part in practices that conflicted with his convictions. 

The pressure doesn’t arise only when responding to patient requests. Sean Murphy, administrator of the Protection of Conscience Project, has warned that newer federal standards increasingly expect clinicians to raise euthanasia themselves. The standards say practitioners must suggest euthanasia and assisted suicide “to patients who have expressed no interest in it simply because the patient might be ‘eligible’ for it,” Murphy said.

Ethical change in health care does not happen only through legislation. It also takes shape through processes that influence public expectations. Marian Neels, president of the B.C. Life Network, said federal consultations on assisted dying reflect a gradual effort to build acceptance of advance requests. “Their strategy is basically about getting people used to the idea, slowly but steadily getting the word out,” said Neels. “After a while you just kind of become desensitized.”

Faith-based health care responds to these pressures differently in different countries. In the United States, Catholic bishops and health-care leaders have often challenged government policy through formal legal and regulatory processes to protect institutional conscience.

In Canada, accommodation has more often been worked out within the publicly funded system itself. Canada’s legal framework has recognized freedom of conscience and religion as protected rights, even within public systems. 

In comments to Canadian Press earlier this year, Rev. Dr.

Miracles still happen today.

At the sanctuary of Our Lady of Lourdes (feast day Feb. 11) in Lourdes, Hautes-Pyrenees, France, 72 cures have been recognized since the Virgin Mary’s first apparition. The most current miracle was proclaimed just last year.

Antonia Raco, a 67-year-old Italian woman diagnosed with primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) in 2006, went on a pilgrimage with the Italian organization UNITALSI in July 2009. Antonia went into the baths and felt an unexpected sense of well-being and the ability to walk again. In August and September of the same year, medical checkups revealed her symptoms had disappeared.

In 2010, she reported that her cure came from visiting the Sanctuary of Our Lady of Lourdes. After numerous investigations, a medical consensus declared her case valid, and her bishop proclaimed the miracle on April 16, 2025.

Just like Antonia, I too was searching for a cure when, in October 2012, I walked the path to the baths in Lourdes. I was on a pilgrimage in Spain to celebrate the beatification of Don Alvaro, the second prelate of Opus Dei, and our group took a side trip to the shrine of Our Lady of Lourdes. We stayed in a very old hotel near the sanctuary, which was only a 15-minute walk away.

I was so excited to exercise my French-speaking skills and to visit the place where St. Bernadette saw visions of Mary. I went to Mass, spent time in the adoration chapel, and prayed the Stations of the Cross, walking throughout the grounds and lighting candles. I filled little bottles with the spring water and drank it like I had never tasted water before.

The more I learned about St. Bernadette and the apparitions of Our Lady, the more I wanted to find healing for my mind in the sanctuary. Unfortunately, the lineup to the baths was too long and the doors had been closed.

I was hoping for a miracle to cure my mental illness, but God had other plans, and the miracle I received was spiritual rather than physical.

My visit to the shrine was not in vain. I felt a deep sense of gratitude and spiritual connection to Mary and Jesus. My faith was strengthened even if I didn’t receive the healing for my mind that I was seeking. Sometimes our prayers aren’t answered in the way or the timeframe we want, but our prayers are always answered. God blesses us and gives us tangible ways to connect to him.

In 1858, Mary appeared 18 times to young Marie Bernard (St. Bernadette) Soubirous with the message of “personal conversion, prayer, and charity.” Like the spring water that bubbled up in the grotto where Mary appeared, we too can see his goodness through the miracles of others and our own personal conversion.

5th Sunday of Ordinary Time, Year A
First Reading: Is 58:6-10
Second Reading: 1 Cor 2:1-5
Gospel Reading: Jn 8:12

“You are the salt of the earth,” Jesus told his disciples, “but if salt has lost its taste, how can its saltiness be restored?”

God became man to free us from slavery to the devil, through whom death had entered the world, and to bring us supernatural life. “I came that they might have life, and have it to the full,” he said.

Jesus himself has supernatural life, divine life, God’s life, by nature, because he is begotten by God the Father, who himself has this life by nature. We, who do not have this life by nature, can get it from him by becoming a member of his mystical body, or by being grafted on to him like a branch on to a vine.

That is what happened at our baptism, by the power of God: we were regenerated, or reborn, with supernatural life. Since then, Jesus has nourished this life with his body and blood.

However, we still suffer concupiscence: the disorder and rebellion among our natural powers that we inherit from Adam and Eve. We do not have the integrity, or wholeness, that they had before their fall; we are fragmented, for our natural desires war with our supernatural desires and even among themselves.

In our struggle to keep our supernatural life healthy, we sometimes fall. Then we have to make a sacramental confession: acknowledge what we have done wrong, tell God we are sorry, promise not to do it again, and make reparation, as far as we can. We also have to nourish our supernatural life by receiving communion frequently.

However, it is not good to eat heavily without exercising. If we do not seriously exercise our supernatural life, it will fall ill and die.

This Sunday’s first reading outlines some of the things we have to do: “to loose the bonds of injustice, to undo the thongs of the yoke, to let the oppressed go free, and to break every yoke.” We must also share our bread with the hungry, shelter the homeless poor, cover the naked, and refrain from speaking evil and judging others.

Then our “light shall break forth like the dawn,” and our “healing shall spring up quickly”; our “vindicator” shall go before us, “the glory of the Lord” shall be our rearguard. Then we can call, and the Lord will answer; we can cry for help, and he will say, “Here I am.”

Then, by the power of God, we will be able to co-operate (“work together”) with Christ in the salvation of the world: in our own flesh we will “fill up what is lacking in the sufferings of Christ for the sake of his body, the Church,” as St.

A striking convergence of events connected to health care is unfolding in British Columbia, with legal, liturgical, and pastoral elements intersecting.

At the centre is a B.C. Supreme Court trial in Vancouver examining whether religious hospitals can be required to allow practices on their premises that conflict with their moral convictions. The case raises questions that go beyond law and policy, potentially touching on the future shape of Catholic health care in Canada.

The trial began on Monday, Jan. 19, propitiously the feast of St. Marguerite Bourgeoys, one of the earliest figures associated with Catholic care for the sick in what would become Canada. Through her Congregation of Notre Dame, Marguerite and her sisters brought care directly to the ill and vulnerable in 17th-century Montreal, long before formal health systems existed. Their work reflected a missionary model rooted in the Visitation, going out to meet people where they were, especially the sick and the poor.

Depending on the outcome of the trial, that model of care grounded less in brick-and-mortar institutions and more on service could again become a prominent feature of Catholic health ministry, even as Catholic hospitals continue to operate within public systems.

The trial is expected to conclude Feb. 6. Just days later, on Feb. 11, the Church observes the World Day of the Sick, which coincides with the Feast of Our Lady of Lourdes, a date chosen by St. John Paul II because of Lourdes’ longstanding association with healing and care for the ill.

Following the Marian apparitions in 1858 and the arrival of thousands of sick pilgrims each year, the Church moved beyond informal charity to a system of medical volunteers, including doctors, nurses, religious sisters, and trained lay caregivers, who provided care. The result was one of the earliest large-scale models of pastoral health care, focusing on compassion, accompaniment, and the dignity of the suffering person. It was that understanding of health care as an expression of mercy that John Paul II drew on when he established the World Day of the Sick.

The week after the Feast of Our Lady of Lourdes comes Ash Wednesday, which similarly reminds us of human frailty and mortality.

It is in the midst of these moments that National Catholic Health Care Week arrives, when Catholics across Canada are invited to reflect on a tradition shaped by the Church’s healing ministry. Reflected in a post-Jubilee theme of “Open Hearts, Healing, Hope,” the tradition has been defined less by bricks and mortar than by what John Paul II described as making present “the merciful love of God through the care and closeness of others.”

With the sun shining on the waves, Archbishop Richard Smith made a pastoral visit to Vancouver’s port ministry, accompanying port chaplains in their duties supporting the spiritual welfare of docked seafarers and ship workers.

The Archbishop toured the facilities with Father Pereira, the national director of Stella Maris Canada, Deacon Dileep Athaide, and long-time ship-visiting volunteer Douglas McDonald, as they performed their duties at the Port of Vancouver.

Port Chaplain Father Eslin Pereira, CMF, said the Archdiocese of Vancouver Apostleship of the Sea team was grateful for the Archbishop’s visit and support. The visit included a meeting with the Port Ecumenical Centre’s Mission to Seafarers administrator, Rev. Peter Smyth, who gave a guided tour of the Vancouver waterfront Seafarers Centre and an overview of the activities and services available to visiting seafarers.

Archbishop Smith also toured a cargo vessel loading Canadian-grown barley at the Alliance Grain Terminal, one of the many independent dock operators along the south side of Burrard Inlet harbour. He met with the ship’s all-Filipino, mostly Catholic, crew of 21, who were thrilled to have the Archbishop visit their ship and to share with him a bit about their work and life aboard.

“It was a real joy to meet the crew aboard the cargo vessel and to spend time with these hardworking men, many of whom are far from their families for long stretches of time,” Archbishop Smith told The B.C. Catholic. “I was grateful for the opportunity to listen to their stories and pray together.”

The Archbishop also thanked port ministry workers and volunteers for being a “powerful sign of the Church’s care for those who are often unseen yet essential to our daily lives.”

“I am deeply grateful for the faithful service of all who ensure seafarers are welcomed, supported, and reminded of their God-given dignity,” he said.

The Apostleship of the Sea is an international Catholic ministry dedicated to the pastoral care of seafarers and their families. It was established in Scotland in 1920 to meet the spiritual and practical needs of sailors who often spent long periods far from home.

In its early years, Stella Maris operated hostels where seafarers could find rest and companionship while their ships were in port, supported by parish volunteers who offered hospitality and guidance.

Your voice matters! Join the conversation by submitting a Letter to the Editor here.

A Vancouver pro-life activist has been charged with mischief after being arrested Jan. 6 during a four-hour protest outside Every Woman’s Health Centre on Commercial Drive.

Lane Walker, 62, who lives in the Downtown Eastside in an intentional interdenominational Christian community, said he was initially charged with violating B.C.’s Access to Abortion Services Act. 

Every Woman’s Health Centre is one of several abortion facilities in Metro Vancouver and has previously been the site of protests and counter-protests. 

Walker, 62, has a history of protesting human rights violations and abortion that goes back to the 1980s.

Walker, who although not Catholic attends Mass at St. Paul’s Church near Oppenheimer Park, said he was taken into custody shortly after 3:30 p.m. while protesting outside the clinic at 2525 Commercial Dr. 

Walker said he had been outside the clinic engaging in conversations with members of the public and police officers. He said he told police he intended to openly defy the Access to Abortion Services Act, the provincial legislation that restricts certain forms of expression within designated access zones around abortion clinics. 

He told The B.C. Catholic the police were “exemplar civil servants” who have “a truly difficult job because high-conflict situations can be very stressful.”

Walker said officers approached him and told him to leave the 50-metre access zone around the clinic. After making it clear he intended to stay in protest, he was arrested and read his rights, he said.

Police told him handcuffs would not be used because his demeanour “did not warrant more forceful measures,” he said.

Police were hesitant to arrest him, he said, describing the process as unusual. “I’ve never been served, read my rights and given my court date all at the same time,” he said. 

He said he was initially charged with violation of the Access to Abortion Services Act, but the charge was later reduced to mischief, a decision he believes was made to avoid engaging with the substance of the protest. 

Under the Criminal Code, mischief is conduct that intentionally interferes with the lawful use of property. 

Walker is scheduled to appear in court on March 18.

Your voice matters! Join the conversation by submitting a Letter to the Editor here.

“Democracy” is one of the most frequently invoked yet least understood words in contemporary politics. It is used to praise, warn, accuse and moralize. We hear that democracy is “under threat” or that certain views are “undemocratic.” Yet when the word is pressed, divergent notions emerge.

For Catholics, this conceptual fog is not an abstract problem. Because truth is a moral category, political discourse clouded by equivocation threatens our ability to judge rightly. What, then, is the Catholic response to the invocations of democratic values? 

As Jacques Maritain argues in Christianity and Democracy, Catholic thought has long intuited a harmony between human dignity, social services and political participation that are commonly associated with democratic life. Articulating this intuition is, therefore, crucial for both the believer and non-believer today.

A helpful way to illuminate the confusion is to distinguish three meanings of “democracy” that are often conflated: as a form of rule, as a form of association and as equality. Each suggests legitimate political concerns but also aligns differently with Catholic teaching.

The first is democracy as a form of rule, understood in its literal Greek sense: the people are the source of political authority. This definition focuses not on the regime’s character but on the location of power. Many assume this form of democracy is inherently good; but Catholic social teaching is more cautious. The Church values participation and shared responsibility, but has never taught that majority will is automatically legitimate. St. John Paul II warned explicitly against this temptation in Centesimus Annus: a democracy without objective moral reference easily becomes a “thinly disguised totalitarianism” — the arbitrary will of a ruler replaced by the arbitrary will of the majority.

The second meaning is democracy as a form of association, more closely associated with the rule of law or constitutionalism. Here, democracy is not based on who holds power but the structures within which power operates: equal treatment before the law, institutional limits, stable procedures and protections for human rights. This understanding resonates deeply with Catholic thought. A political order that protects the dignity of each person, regardless of social standing, through impartial norms aligns with the Church’s insistence on the intrinsic worth of the human person. Yet, crucially, nothing in this understanding of democracy requires popular rule. A constitutional regime could even be monarchical and still uphold these “democratic” values.

The third meaning takes democracy to imply substantive equality: such a society must guarantee not only equal legal standing but a wide range of social and economic outcomes. Goods like housing, health care and food security — once matters of familial duty, communal responsibility and personal charity — are recast as enforceable entitlements.

3rd Sunday of Ordinary Time, Year A
First Reading: Is 9:1-4
Second Reading: 1 Cor 1:10-13, 17-18
 Gospel Reading: Mt 4:12-23

The Church’s Jubilee Year of Hope has ended, but Christian hope has not.

Unfortunately, Catholics have almost ceased to notice that Christian hope “ensues from a real encounter” with God, said Pope Benedict XVI in his encyclical Spe Salvi (“Saved by Hope”).

Non-Christians try to comfort themselves at funerals with empty promises like, “He’ll never be dead, for we will always remember him.”

A man dying of AIDS told a pastoral worker that he had “no hope.” He burst into tears, sobbing like a child, and cried out, “Tell me how I can have hope!”

In contrast, Christians know that “they have a future,” the Pope said: they do not know “the details of what awaits them, but they know in general terms that their life will not end in emptiness.”

This Sunday’s readings tell us that when God became Man, “the people who walked in darkness” saw “a great light”; “the yoke of their burden” and “the rod of their oppressor” were broken; “anguish and gloom” were replaced by hope.

Jesus “knows even the path that passes through the valley of death,” the Pope said; he walks with us “even on the path of final solitude,” where no one else can accompany us.

“He himself has walked this path, He has descended into the kingdom of death, He has conquered death, and he has returned to accompany us now and to give us the certainty that, together with him, we can find a way through.”

“This was the new hope that arose over the life of believers” when God became Man, he said.

According to the Christian faith, our salvation is not simply a given. In the Second Reading, St. Paul speaks not of “us who have been saved,” but of “us who are being saved.”

No; “redemption is offered to us in the sense that we have been given hope, trustworthy hope, by virtue of which we can face our present,” the Pope said.

Without such hope, life is unbearable, he said. With such hope, we can face poverty, persecution, and even death. “The present, even if it is arduous, can be lived and accepted if it leads toward a goal, if we can be sure of this goal, and if this goal is great enough to justify the effort of the journey.”

Humans have a profound need for hope, as that AIDS patient realized. “We need the greater and lesser hopes that keep us going day by day,” the Pope said, “but these are not enough without the great hope, which must surpass everything else.